Bertagna, Blake R. The government’s Ten Commandments: Pleasant Grove City v. Summum and the government speech doctrine. 58 Drake L. Rev. 1-65 (2009).
Crist, Terry M. III. Comment. Equally confused: construing RLUIPA’s equal terms provision. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 1139-1166 (2009).
Luther, Robert III. “Unity through division”: religious liberty and the virtue of pluralism in the context of legislative prayer controversies. 43 Creighton L. Rev. 1-34 (2009).
McCrea, Ronan. Religion as a basis of law in the public order of the European Union. 16 Colum. J. Eur. L. 81-119 (2009/2010).
Ryan, Erin. Federalism at the Cathedral: property rules, liability rules, and inalienability rules in Tenth Amendment infrastructure. 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1-95 (2010).
East, Erin N. Comment. I object: the RLUIPA as a model for protecting the conscience rights of religious objectors to same-sex relationships. 59 Emory L.J. 259-309 (2009).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Representative democracy is predicated upon civil and honest discourse. Any comments displaying ad hominum attacks, improper language, bias, or harsh rhetoric will be removed.